There is a disturbing moment in the novel Blindness by José Saramago when a man suddenly loses his sight while waiting at a traffic light. His blindness spreads quickly through the city. Drivers abandon their cars. Streets fall into chaos. Institutions crumble. Society begins to unravel. But the true horror of the novel is not the epidemic. It is the realization that the blindness did not begin with the disease. The blindness was already there. People could see. They navigated their lives, went to work, obeyed rules, and participated in society. Yet they failed to notice the fragile threads that hold a community together—responsibility, empathy, restraint. When those threads finally snapped, the collapse appeared sudden. In truth, it had been forming quietly for years. Sometimes I think about that when I look at everyday life in Kenya. We are remarkably skilled at diagnosing what is wrong with the country. Conversations are filled with sharp observations about corruption, inequ...
“A man is only as faithful as his options.” Whether Chris Rock said it or not almost doesn’t matter anymore. The line has survived because it names something uncomfortable: that many of our choices are not moral declarations, but negotiations with what is available to us. We like to believe we choose freely. That our lives are shaped by preference, conviction, taste, discipline. But the longer you sit with that sentence, the more it unsettles you — not just in relationships, but in work, lifestyle, ambition, and the quiet stories we tell ourselves about who we are. What if much of what we call choice is actually adaptation ? Take fidelity. We praise loyalty as virtue, as character. But how often is loyalty reinforced by lack of alternatives? How often does commitment hold not because temptation was conquered, but because it never arrived? The same logic applies far beyond romance. We stay in jobs we “like” because we have no viable exit. We live modestly and call it minimalism bec...