The Grand Coalition Government of 2008 was born out of national crisis — a desperate answer to a contested election and a country teetering on the edge of civil war. It was not a triumph, but a truce. And while it succeeded in restoring calm, the scars it left behind run deep and remain largely unhealed.
For many, this was a turning point not just in politics, but in the national psyche. The choices made in that era continue to shape how Kenya governs, how it spends, how it reconciles — or fails to — and how we as individuals have come to fear conflict more than we demand accountability.
A Deal That Changed Everything
Brokered under international pressure after the disputed 2007 elections and the horrific post-election violence that followed, the Grand Coalition Government brought together political rivals Mwai Kibaki and Raila Odinga in an uneasy power-sharing agreement.
On paper, it was a masterstroke of diplomacy. In practice, it was a bloated compromise that planted the idea that power is something to be split and traded — not earned through clear, democratic processes.
The Birth of the Bloated Government
To make the coalition work, the cabinet ballooned to 42 ministries — among the largest in the world at the time. Raila was made Prime Minister, and not one but two Deputy Prime Ministers were appointed. Why two? Because power, in this arrangement, had become symbolic. It was not about efficiency; it was about appeasement.
This moment marked the beginning of Kenya’s normalization of oversized, expensive governance. Even today, parliament, county governments, and public offices reflect this logic — more seats, more appointments, more titles. Not to serve Kenyans better, but to keep elites content.
Appeasement Politics and Its National Cost
The Grand Coalition introduced a troubling precedent: that political unrest can be silenced by creating positions, not solving root issues. The violence of 2007-2008 was never truly addressed at the grassroots. There were commissions, yes — but few prosecutions, little justice.
This logic of appeasement has bled into every corner of governance:
Political losers are offered ministries.
Tribes are placated with development promises.
Corrupt officials are quietly recycled into different roles.
And we, the people, have inherited this same coping mechanism — forgiving too quickly to avoid the discomfort of truth. We like peace. But sometimes we like it too cheaply.
The Fear of Consequences
The coalition government sent another message: you can cause national turmoil, but if you're powerful enough, you will still get a seat at the table. No real consequences. No real reckoning.
This way of thinking now echoes in our homes, workplaces, and personal relationships:
We avoid hard conversations.
We choose harmony over accountability.
We say “let’s move on” before we've even understood what went wrong.
Our national inability to sit with pain, to interrogate harm, has shaped a culture that prefers performance over healing.
Legacy of the Era
It wasn’t all failure. The 2010 Constitution was born in this time. Some key institutions were strengthened. But even those victories carry the fingerprints of compromise — progressive in language, slow in implementation.
The Grand Coalition Era gave Kenya a second chance at peace. But it also taught us how to disguise dysfunction as unity, and how to buy silence instead of earning trust.
Conclusion: A Wound We Still Carry
What we lived through in 2008 was not just a political crisis — it was a national trauma. And how we responded has shaped who we are today. Our bloated government, our obsession with power-sharing, our fear of confrontation — they all trace back to this moment.
To move forward, we must remember: peace without justice is just a pause. And every time we choose appeasement over accountability, we rob ourselves of the future we deserve.
This is the true legacy of the Grand Coalition — not just a political formation, but a reflection of a society still learning how to heal without hiding.
Comments
Post a Comment